出版道德与渎职声明

Duties of Authors

Originality and Plagiarism:Authors ought to make sure that they need written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others this should be fitly cited or quoted. Such quotations and citations should be listed within the Reference at the top of the article.

多个出版物：AN author shouldn't generally publish manuscripts describing primarily constant analysis in additional than one journal or primary publication. Submitting constant manuscript to over one journal at the same time constitutes unethical business enterprise behaviour and is unacceptable.

确认资源：正确确认他人的工作应该倾向于倾向。作者应该引用有力的出版物，以确定传闻作品的性质。

Authorship of the Paper:作者身份应仅限于为研究的概念，设计，执行或解释做出重大贡献的人，并将被列为合着者。其他已经参与了科学研究的实质性方面的人，应该被承认或列为贡献者。

对应作者：Corresponding author is that the author answerable for human activity with the journal for publication. The corresponding author ought to make sure that all applicable co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are enclosed on the paper. All co-authors have seen and approved the ultimate version of the paper and have united to its submission for publication.

Acknowledgment of Funding Sources:在本文的顶部，应准时承认本文中有传言的分析资金来源。

披露和利益冲突：所有作者都应在其手稿中披露任何货币或替代实质性利益冲突，这些货币或替代性实质性冲突可能被解释为影响其手稿的结果或解释。

印刷作品中的基本错误：Once AN author discovers a major error or quality in his/her own printed work, it's the author’s obligation to promptly inform the journal editors or publisher and work with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Duties of Reviewers
Contribution of critique:critique assists the editors in creating editorial choices whereas editorial communications with the author can also assist the author in raising the paper.

不合格评审或迅速:Any reviewer WHO feels unqualified to review the allotted manuscript or unable to supply a prompt review ought to inform the editors and excuse him/her from the review method.

Confidentiality:收到的手稿应视为机密文件。除了由首席编辑许可之外，他们不需要向其他人展示或提及其他人。通过批评获得的特权数据或想法应不间断，不要用于私人优势。

Standards of sound judgment:评论应客观地进行。对作者没有个人批评。审稿人应该通过支持论点清楚地将他们的观点分类。

确认资源：Reviewers ought to determine relevant printed work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that had been antecedent reported elsewhere ought to be in the middle of the relevant citation. A reviewer ought to conjointly decision to the chief editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript into consideration and the other printed paper of that they need personal information.

利益冲突：Reviewers ought to decline to review manuscripts during which they need conflicts of interest ensuing from competitive, cooperative, or alternative relationships or connections with any of the authors.

编辑的职责

关于出版文章的决定：The editors of Revues are answerable for deciding that of the articles submitted to the journal ought to be printed. The editors could also be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board subjected to such legal necessities concerning libel, infringement and plagiarism. The editors might check with reviewers in creating this call. Even in cases wherever peer reviews are positive, the editors might decline to publish the paper or give the author with additional comments on the way to modify the article. Ought to the ultimate version not win over the editors, its publication should be rejected. The ultimate call concerning the publication lies with the editors.

Fair Play:Manuscripts shall be evaluated entirely on their intellectual benefit.
Confidentiality: The editors and any editorial employees should not disclose any info a couple of submitted manuscript to anyone aside from the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, different editorial advisers, and also the publisher.

披露和利益冲突：Unpublished materials disclosed during a submitted manuscript should not be employed by anyone WHO contains a read of the manuscript whereas handling it in his or her own analysis while not the specific written consent of the author